ReasoningOnline
LegalBench
Evaluates legal reasoning across collaboratively contributed tasks covering varied legal domains and text formats.
- Task count
- 162
There are 50 reasoning in the index.
50 benchmarks
ReasoningOnline
Evaluates legal reasoning across collaboratively contributed tasks covering varied legal domains and text formats.
ReasoningOnline
Evaluates legal language understanding across seven English classification datasets using a common evaluation setup.
ReasoningOnline
Tests six capability areas with regularly refreshed questions and objective, non-judge scoring.
ReasoningOnline
Tests broad academic knowledge and reasoning with multiple-choice questions drawn from 57 subjects.
ReasoningOnline
Evaluates broad knowledge and reasoning with harder multiple-choice questions, expanded answer choices, and reduced ambiguity relative to MMLU.
ReasoningOnline
Tests conversational quality on challenging multi-turn, open-ended questions scored by model judges.
ReasoningOnline
Tests question answering on real Google queries paired with Wikipedia pages and short or long answer annotations.
ReasoningOnline
Evaluates whether language models choose solver-backed actions in 11,000 pre-flop and post-flop poker scenarios.
ReasoningOnline
Evaluates numerical question answering over combined tables and prose from financial reports.
ReasoningOnline
Tests reading comprehension and open-domain question answering with trivia questions paired to independently gathered evidence.
ReasoningOnline
Tests whether language models reproduce common human misconceptions and falsehoods when answering questions.
ReasoningOnline
Evaluates information-seeking question answering across 11 typologically diverse languages.
ReasoningOnline
Evaluates language modeling on more than 100 million tokens drawn from verified Wikipedia articles.
ReasoningOnline
Tests chat models on challenging real-user requests using task-specific checklists and model-based judges.
ReasoningOnline
Tests commonsense reasoning by resolving pronouns in adversarially collected sentence pairs.
ReasoningOnline
Evaluates cross-lingual natural-language inference and language transfer across 15 languages.
ReasoningOnline
Evaluates cross-lingual extractive question answering on the same question-answer pairs translated across 11 languages.
ReasoningOnline
Evaluates planning and reinforcement learning in procedurally generated box-pushing puzzles.
ReasoningOnline
Evaluates language models on a compact suite of ten HELM scenarios selected for broad coverage and lower evaluation cost.
ReasoningOnline
Evaluates English and Spanish multi-turn humor understanding through joke classification and identification of each line’s role.
ReasoningOnline
Tests knowledge and reasoning on harder ten-option questions with reduced reliance on recall.
ReasoningOnline
Tests everyday reasoning about space, time, social situations, and adversarial wording with multiple-choice questions.
ReasoningOnline
Tests extractive reading comprehension and whether a system abstains when a Wikipedia passage does not answer the question.
ReasoningOnline
Evaluates systems that return concise answers to fact-based questions from large text collections.
Published by AI Benchmark Index. How we check each benchmark.